The Great Depression of 1930s

The Roaring twenties started so promising. Technology and innovations were making air travel, telephone, radio and electricity easier to use and access. The economy was on the rise even after an expensive Great War. But it came to a crashing end in 1930s. The Great Depression altered many American lives. It gave birth to many modern economic policies. But the question many historians have argued is, what caused the Great Depression?

Initially, many historians believed the Great Crash of 1929 caused the Great Depression. But, as more studies have been completed, some historians have steered from this notion. They still believed the Great Crash played a factor in the economic downspin but was not the cause of the Great Depression. An economic article by Jason Taylor explains โ€œthe economy turned down beยญcause of other factors and dragged down the stock market with it. Over the last several decades, in fact, econยญomists have moved away from the notion that the stock market crash caused the Great Depressionโ€.[1] These other factors are believed to be bad economic policies. Letโ€™s start with the banking policies.

If you see the graph below, the money supply and the price level fell. This was due to bad banking polices leading to bank failures and reduction of bank deposits.[2] It started with small, rural banks losing money due to large loan failing.[3] These failures date back to 1925 โ€œespecially in the middle west where prices of commodities and farm land had started down in 1925 after an enormous rise during and following the First World War.[4] The stock market crash in 1929 started worry in the banking system. This led to banks closing to depositors. In 1931, โ€œBritain departure from the gold standardโ€ deepen the depression.[5] Eventually, the failed banks had to be liquidated at a considerable loss.[6] Unfortunately, these losses and polices led to depositors having their assets frozen or devalued. Many banks had no assistance to reopen business or to repay their depositors. These failures were attributed by bad policies of banks trying to grow rapidly by taking on high risk loans.

As explained above, the money supply and pricing level falling played a role in causing the depression, but a decline of economic output led to money and prices dropping. The demand for supplies were down. With the demand being down, production slowed down, and this led to unemployment. If unemployment is high, wages would drop due to people rather working for less than not working at all. However, President Hebert Hoover believed in the High-Wage Doctrine.  Hoover believed higher wages led to โ€œprosperity, rather than the other way aroundโ€.[7] If you make more money, you will spend more money is the belief of the President and his staff. This leads to more supply and demand. However, this led to employers having higher marginal costs which led to products being more expensive.

The last policy was the Smoot-Hawley Tariff. This tariff raised the average tariff rate on dutiable imports. It was the highest rate in โ€œnearly hundred yearsโ€.[8] The tariff was met with a wave of retaliation. Countries like Spain, Switzerland boycotted American goods. Canada, Mexico, Cuba and France raised their tariffs on American goods.  President Franklin Roosevelt explained the tariff, โ€œforced other countries off gold by preventing them from paying their debts in goods. This was the standard accusation that the United States had failed to act like a creditor nationโ€.[9] Roosevelt argued that when we ran out of gold, more countries sent goods which caused lower prices when in reality it shouldโ€™ve been opposite.

The Great Depression showed an underlying defect in the system. Or does it show, at times policies do more harm than help.  In the end, it was caused due to economic policies and lasted to the Second World War. And unfortunately, it was not the last economic downturn in American History.

Biography

Douglass, Lonna, and Brett Flehinger. “Great Depression: Causes: What Caused the Great Depression?” History in Dispute, edited by Robert J. Allison, vol. 3: American Social and Political Movements, 1900-1945: Pursuit of Progress, St. James Press, 2000, pp. 54-61. Gale In Context: U.S. History, https://link-galecom.ezproxy.liberty.edu/apps/doc/CX2876300015/UHIC?u=vic_liberty&sid=UHIC&xid=d443938e. Accessed 22 Mar. 2020.

Hamby, Alonzo L. For the Survival of Democracy: Franklin Roosevelt and the World Crisis of the 1930s. New York: Free Press, 2004.

Kindleberger, Charles Poor. The World in Depression, 1929-1939. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.

Richardson, Gary. “Categories and Causes of Bank Distress during the Great Depression, 1929โ€“1933: The Illiquidity Versus Insolvency Debate Revisited.” Explorations in Economic History 44, no. 4 (2007): 588-607.

Taylor, Jason. The Great Depression and Its Aftermath 1929โ€“1950s. CQ Press Guide to U.S. Economic Policy /. Thousand Oaks, California: CQ Press, 2014.


Footnotes

[1] Jason Taylor, The Great Depression and Its Aftermath 1929โ€“1950s, CQ Press Guide to U.S. Economic Policy. Thousand Oaks, California: CQ Press, 2014.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Gary Richardson, “Categories and Causes of Bank Distress during the Great Depression, 1929โ€“1933: The Illiquidity Versus Insolvency Debate Revisited.” Explorations in Economic History 44, no. 4 (2007): 588-607.

[4] Kindleberger, Charles Kindleberger, The World in Depression, 1929-1939, (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973), 129

[5] Gary Richardson, “Categories and Causes of Bank Distress during the Great Depression, 1929โ€“1933: The Illiquidity Versus Insolvency Debate Revisited.”

[6] Ibid

[7] Jason Taylor, The Great Depression and Its Aftermath 1929โ€“1950s, CQ Press Guide to U.S. Economic Policy.

[8] Ibid.

[9] Kindleberger, Charles Kindleberger, The World in Depression, 1929-1939, (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973), 124



Curse of the Bambino

Baseball is known as Americaโ€™s past time. From 1900-1920โ€™s, baseball was one of the countryโ€™s most popular sport. There were many household names with celebrity status. Ty Cobb, Lou Gehrig and Lefty Grove are to name a few. But the biggest name was George Herman โ€œBabeโ€ Ruth Jr. In 1920, the Red Sox sold Babe Ruth to their rival the New York Yankees which altered the economic landscape of both teams and Babe Ruth himself. The financial impact this move had helped the teamโ€™s owners which was unprecedent for its time. But, more importantly it also gave Ruth power to financially better himself.

Babe Ruth played Major League Baseball from 1914-1935. Upon retiring from baseball in 1935, he was the homerun king. Many sportswriters argued today if Babe Ruth is the greatest baseball player to ever play the game. He was a sensation and โ€œbaseball greatest attractionโ€.[1] To call him an attraction was absolutely justified; a well-known story was the Boston Red Sox sold his rights to the New York Yankees. The move was a first for this era. The New York Yankees purchased Babe Ruth โ€œfor $100,000, highest price in baseball annalsโ€.[2] Ruth financial value to the Yankees was worth the remarkable spending. They felt Ruth would bring success to the team which in turn lead to financial return.

Ruth annual salary was $20,000 a year after being sold to the Yankees. He initially was making $10,000 a year as a Red Sox. The Red Sox financial reward was not only the $100,000 selling price but the Yankโ€™s loaned the Red Sox $300,000. This amount was used to help then owner, Harry Frazeeโ€™s Broadway theaters.[3] This loan helped Frazeeโ€™s theaters become stabilized after some failures. He always wanted success in the entertainment industry. This amount helped Frazee โ€œput on the smash hit Broadway musical No, No, Nanetteโ€ which would not had occurred without this move.[4] These facts showed Ruth status as a financial asset to not only himself but to the Yankees and Red Sox.

The impact Ruth had on the Red Sox does not pale into comparison with the Yankees. The amount the Yankees paid was unprecedented but if you reviewed the chart below (Table 1). It will show the revenue impact Ruth had on the Yankees. The biggest revenue increase was in 1926. The Yankees revenue increased by $240,597.00. Overall, the Yankees profited over 2 million dollars during Ruth Era. To put in perspectives, Ruthโ€™s highest annual salary earnings was $84,098.00. In 1926, Ruth salary was $49,605.00, this was the year Yankees had their most profitable success.[5]

Ruth understood the affect he had on the team and the league. As we see today with superstar athletes, there are some contractual disputes. It was in the late 20s to the next decade โ€œRuthโ€™s salary clashes with Yankees owner Jacob Ruppert became the subject of much public attention and discussionโ€.[6] This is not uncommon today but during this era, it was ahead of its time in sports. Ruth challenged the labor system and how players were treated โ€œas chattel, literally selling them from one team to another and providing them no option of seeking employment on other teamsโ€.[7] Ruth effected the game on and off field.

Ruth salary average from 1926 to 1932 was $76,110.00. His salary had a disparity with U.S. Production workers. Many workers made around $1000.00 a year.[8] These figures show Ruthโ€™s ability to negotiate his contract value. He understood his economical value to a team that was profiting from his likeness. He was the highest paid player in the league, but he was also the most profitable.

Babe Ruth was the most famous financial investment in Yankees history. They were awarded for their spending by over 1200% in profit. Not only did the Yankees benefit but Ruth himself was financially compensated. He had to fight for his salary at times because he understood his economical value. Ruth was ahead of his time as today, many athleteโ€™s holdout due to contract dispute in a billion-dollar industry.

Biography

Haupert, Michael. “The Sultan of swag: Babe Ruth as a financial investment.” The Baseball Research Journal 44, no. 2 (2015): 100+. Gale General OneFile (accessed April 8, 2020). https://link-gale-com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/apps/doc/A433878484/ITOF?u=vic_liberty&sid=ITOF&xid=28ecdcd5.

Pantuosco, Louis J. and Gary Stone. “babe Ruth as a Free Agent: What the Old-Time Greats would Earn in Today’s Labor Market for Baseball Players.” The American Economist 55, no. 2 (2010): 154-161.

Vass, George. “Some of baseball’s strangest deals ever made from Babe Ruth being unloaded for financial purposes to clubs exchanging managers, there have been some odd trades in the game’s history.” Baseball Digest, September-October 2010, 18+. Gale General OneFile (accessed April 8, 2020). https://link-gale-com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/apps/doc/A238153328/ITOF?u=vic_liberty&sid=ITOF&xid=42a59f29.

Wehrle, Edmund F. Breaking Babe Ruth: Baseball’s Campaign Against Its Biggest Star. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2018.


[1] Michael Haupert, “The Sultan of swag: Babe Ruth as a financial investment.” The Baseball Research Journal 44, no. 2 (2015): 100+. Gale General OneFile (accessed April 8, 2020).

[2] Ibid.

[3] Ibid.

[4] George Vass, “Some of baseball’s strangest deals ever made from Babe Ruth being unloaded for financial purposes to clubs exchanging managers, there have been some odd trades in the game’s history.” Baseball Digest, September-October 2010, 18+. Gale General OneFile (accessed April 8, 2020).

[5] Ibid.

[6] Edmund F. Wehrle, Breaking Babe Ruth: Baseball’s Campaign Against Its Biggest Star, (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2018), 9

[7] Ibid.

[8] Michael Haupert, “The Sultan of swag: Babe Ruth as a financial investment.”

Charles W. Chesnutt

Charles W. Chesnutt was an African American author during the postbellum era. Some of his most studied work was fictional tales called The Wife of His Youth and The Conjure Woman. Chesnutt was known as a novelist but would say he was an entrepreneur. Not only being a novelist, he was a school Principal, he was a practicing attorney, while practicing law, he became a success businessman with a legal stenography company.

His works was praised by his readers, but he was not a best-selling author during his time. He was writing a generation too early due writing methods. Chesnutt molded his entire life after the kind of enlightenment philosophies, โ€œGilded Age entrepreneurialism, individualist self-determination, rigorous self-improvementโ€ which he felt could extend to the masses and abolish the beliefs of black folk culture.[1]

Chesnutt is quoted of saying โ€œIt is not altogether the money. It is a mixture of motives. I want fame; I want money; I want to raise my children in a different rank of life from that I sprang fromโ€.[2] Chesnuttโ€™s belief that authorship is a vocation that, far from transcending economics, is chosen in large measure because it can serve as a unique means by which to secure both fame and fortune.


[1] Taylor, Matthew A. “HOODOO YOU THINK YOU ARE?: Self-Conjuration in Chesnuttโ€™s The Conjure Woman.” In Universes without Us: Posthuman Cosmologies in American Literature, 113-38. (Minneapolis; London: University of Minnesota Press, 2013), 114

[2] Hewitt, Elizabeth. “CHARLES CHESNUTT’S CAPITALIST CONJURINGS.” Elh 76, no. 4 (931-962, Winter, 2009), 933

Biography

Hewitt, Elizabeth. “CHARLES CHESNUTT’S CAPITALIST CONJURINGS.” Elh 76, no. 4 (Winter, 2009): 931-962, http://ezproxy.liberty.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/docview/222981126?accountid=12085.

Sarnowski, Joe. “Self-preservation’: Identity, Idealism, and Pragmatism in Charles W. Chesnutt’s ‘The Wife of His Youth.” Papers on Language & Literature 54, no. 4 (2018): 315+. Gale General OneFile (accessed April 1, 2020). https://link-gale-com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/apps/doc/A566401076/ITOF?u=vic_liberty&sid=ITOF&xid=e63f109c.

Taylor, Matthew A. “HOODOO YOU THINK YOU ARE?: Self-Conjuration in Chesnuttโ€™s The Conjure Woman.” In Universes without Us: Posthuman Cosmologies in American Literature, 113-38. Minneapolis; London: University of Minnesota Press, 2013. Accessed April 1, 2020. www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt5vkbw6.8.

Wood, Mary E. “โ€œA State of Mind Akin to Madnessโ€: Charles W. Chesnutt’s Short Fiction and the New Psychiatry.” American Literary Realism 44, no. 3 (2012): 189-208. Accessed April 2, 2020. doi:10.5406/amerlitereal.44.3.0189.